Suggested readings, #5

Here are some interesting articles I’ve come across recently, for your consideration:

Mussolini (or his ghost) unfortunately resurfaces in Milan. (New York Times)

Why Lucretius believed in a Flat Earth (and his contemporaries already didn’t), and the malaise of modern science. (Aeon)

Is there a problem with how scientists (and philosophers) study reason? Maybe, but not necessarily along the lines sketched by this article. (Nautilus)

Julian Savulescu is just as controversial as his mentor, Peter Singer. Sometimes for good reasons, other times not so much. (Nautilus)

Cheerfulness cannot be compulsory, no matter what the t-shirts say. (Aeon)

Advertisements

Suggested readings, #4

Here are some interesting articles I’ve come across recently, for your consideration:

David Brooks thinks our culture tells us five crucial lies. He may be onto something. (New York Times)

A critical but friendly commentary on Lee Smolin’s new book: Einstein’s Unfinished Revolution. In case you wanted more about the current mess in fundamental physics. (NPR)

Epictetus and the problem of philosophical progress. (3 Quarks Daily)

Socrates’ philosophy shows why moral posturing on social media is so darn annoying. (QZ)

A long and somewhat rambling article on why bioethicists are not doing enough to stem the new eugenics. Several good points, a recurring bad argument. See if you can spot it. (New Atlantis)

Suggested readings, #3

Here are some interesting articles I’ve come across recently, for your consideration:

Why is simpler better? Ockham’s Razor says that simplicity is a scientific virtue, but justifying this philosophically is strangely elusive, says my colleague Elliott Sober. (Aeon)

Sabine Hossenfelder discusses the current chaotic state of fundamental physics, showing why “beauty” gets in the way of science. To be read in tandem with the above linked article by Sober. (Nautilus)

I had no idea what “ethical interilimity” is. Now that I’ve found out from this article by Sam Ben-Meir, I doubt it’s a particular useful or coherent concept. But I could be wrong. (Blitz)

I’ve explained before why Jordan Peterson ain’t no Stoic (he doesn’t claim to be, but some people think he is). This article actually by Jennifer Baker argues (correctly) that is an anti-Stoic. (Psychology Today)

One more on Peterson, this time a commentary on his recent inane debate with the equally embarrassing Slavoj Žižek. “Enjoy.”

Why trust a theory? Epistemology of fundamental physics

Cambridge University Press has recently published a volume edited by Radin Dardashti, Richard Dawid, and Karim Thebault entitled Why Trust a Theory? Epistemology of Fundamental Physics. I have contributed a chapter to the effort, on “Philosophy of science and the string wars: a view from the outside,” which is available as free download here.

This is the description of the book: Do we need to reconsider scientific methodology in light of modern physics? Has the traditional scientific method become outdated, does it need to be defended against dangerous incursions, or has it always been different from what the canonical view suggests? To what extent should we accept non-empirical strategies for scientific theory assessment?

Many core aspects of contemporary fundamental physics are far from empirically well-confirmed. There is controversy on the epistemic status of the corresponding theories, in particular cosmic inflation, the multiverse, and string theory. This collection of essays is based on the high profile workshop ‘Why Trust a Theory?’ and provides interdisciplinary perspectives on empirical testing in fundamental physics from leading physicists, philosophers and historians of science. Integrating different contemporary and historical positions, it will be of interest to philosophers of science and physicists, as well as anyone interested in the foundations of contemporary science.

Suggested readings, #2

Here are some interesting articles I’ve come across recently, for your consideration:

John Malkovich to star in a new movie as Stoic philosopher Seneca. (Screen Daily)

Are we witnessing the end of satire? The toxic disinformation of social media has rendered traditional forms of humor quaint and futile. (New York Times)

Will the link between space and time as told by modern physics ever be intuitive? I doubt it, but this article is more optimistic. (Nautilus)

Facebook offers UK users a whopping 71 options for their gender. A bit too much, perhaps? (The Telegraph) This is closer to my own thinking. (Aeon)

Oxford philosopher’s new hypothesis predicts the rise of super villains. Maybe. Or perhaps this is the sort of thing that gives philosophy a bad reputation. (TNW)

Suggested readings, #1

Vintage old books on wooden table over grunge background

Here are some interesting articles I’ve come across recently, for your consideration:

Vladimir Nabokov, literary refugee. (New York Times)

A New study questions Judith Butler’s famous contention that “male” and “female” are merely social constructs. (Psychology Today)

Was the real Socrates more amorous than we knew? (Aeon)

Warning: this friendship has been digitized. (New York Times)

Big Gods came after the rise of civilization, not before. (The Conversation)

Welcome!

Welcome on Green Road SignWelcome to my personal page and blog. Here you will find updated lists of my books, my public outreach articles, my technical papers, and related materials.

I will also publish occasional updates on my podcasts and more substantive blog posts, as well as announcements of public activity such as appearances to conferences, solo talks, and so forth.

To get us started, here is my main blog, Figs in Winter (118 articles and counting), devoted to practical philosophy. And here is my almost daily podcast, Stoic Meditations (343 episodes and counting). Plenty to read and listen to.

Thanks for checking the page out, I hope you’ll keep returning for more!